InfoSAWIT, JAKARTA – In March 2023, Astra Agro Lestari (AAL) announced that the company assigned consultant group - Eco Nusantara, as the third party to investigate violation assumption about environment and human rights that its subsidiary did. The company has completed term of reference in the investigation.

In October 2023, the consultant of AAL informed the verification result from the investigation with the title ‘Verifikasi Pengaduan Terhadap PT Mamuang, PT Lestari Tani Teladan dan PT Agro Nusa Abadi’. This was encouraged by the findings of Friends of the Earth – US (FoE-US) and Wahana Lingkungan Hidup (Walhi). The analysis focused on the weakness, inaccurate focus, small scale report findings, and the critical weaknesses in the investigation.

As in the official statement to InfoSAWIT, Wednesday (29/11/2023), the investigation report and verification were not qualified, inaccurate, and it is a big mistake to get solution on unfinished area conflicts and confirm recovery for the losses.

Walhi and FoE US mentioned that at least, there are six disablements which are not the same with the report: the first, the investigation managed disable term of reference and process and it was decided by one party, ignored the inputs from civil organizations though the consultant of AAL asked for input and guaranteed that the input would be taken into consideration.

The second, the investigation failed to review some critical accusations that were firstly documented in March 20222 report that was published by Walhi and FoE – US, such as, the licensing irregularities that the subsidiaries of AAL did, forest degradation until to the river, and some other criminals.

The third, it failed to examine if AAL and its subsidiaries tried to get free prior informed concern (FPIC) from the villagers that got the impacts (particularly, there is not 2023 verification report about FPIC).

The fourth, it failed to focus to investigate AAL but managed the burden of evidence to indigenous community, culture, and smallholders (farmers); the fifth, the report was incomplete, inadequate, and in some points, it was inaccurate.

The sixth, it revealed bias to maintain status quo by not acknowledging the violation that AAL and its subsidiaries did. “It stated recommendation that the root was from development model by putting the people’s welfare on the private company operation but not acknowledging rights of option and fate determination from those that got human rights,” Walhi and FoE – US noted.

Walhi also noted, the analysis would be about to deliver inputs for the stakeholders and government’s institutions, buyers of AAL, shareholders, consumer goods companies, civil organizations, and communities that care (about the case).

“It needs to understand the specific minor in the verification report and mistake that AAL always does in responding complaints and claims from the people to get solution and valuable compensation,” Walhi noted. (T2)